Thoughts on Human Learning vs. Machine Learning

Posted by Peter Rudin on 13. January 2017 in Essay

Picture Credit: Public Domain, Jean Marc Cote, 1901


Learning is the act of acquiring new or reinforcing existing knowledge, behaviors, skills or values. Humans have the ability to learn, however with the progress  in artificial intelligence,  machine learning has become a resource which can augment or even replace  human learning. Learning does not happen all at once, but it builds upon and is shaped by previous knowledge. To that end, learning may be viewed as a process, rather than a collection of factual and procedural knowledge.

Both human as well as machine learning generate knowledge, one residing in the brain the other residing in the machine. This fact raises the question how we apply what kind of knowledge and how we balance these knowledge resources for optimal results. The following discussion hopefully provides some guidance how we can assess this balance keeping in mind that further progress in machine learning and brain research will impact this discussion.

Characteristics of Human Learning

Motivation is a important for human learning. Generally  one differentiates  between intrinsic  and extrinsic motivation.  Intrinsic motivation is involved when one does something because one enjoys it or finds it interesting, extrinsic motivation when doing  something for external rewards or to avoid negative consequences.

Learning within the context of extrinsic human motivation is closely coupled with formal education and the aim of our teaching institutions  to transfer knowledge as efficiently as possible  to meet the requirements of employment within various business sectors.

Today’s formal education concepts are based  on results of ongoing brain research and psychology. One of the key researchers in this field Benjamin Bloom, former educational psychologist and professor at the University of Chicago developed  a reference guide for tutors called ‘Bloom’s Taxanomy’. It provides a hierarchical model for the cognitive procedures and goals of learning divided into 6 levels where level 1 is the most basic level for teaching knowledge acquisition and level 6 the top with the highest educational requirements to meet the goals of a specific educational program. Mastering a specific level is a prerequisite to move on to the next higher level. The levels are defined as follows:

  1. Remembering/Memorizing defined as the knowing of previously learned material or retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge.
  2. Understanding defined as being able to comprehend facts by comparing and interpreting main ideas within the learned material.
  3. Applying defined as the ability to use learned material in a new or unprompted way of abstraction and to solve a newly defined problem.
  4. Analyzing defined as the ability to examine a problem area and identify the various components (breaking the problem down).
  5. Evaluating defined as the ability to make judgments based on criteria or standards or to combine parts to form a new concept or idea.
  6. Creating defined as the ability to integrate learning from different areas into a plan for solving a problem and to propose alternative solutions.

Next to formal education human learning occurs in many other informal scenarios such as ‘on-the-job-training’, experimenting, observing, testing etc.  One of the questions raised is how effective what method of learning is and how long the learned material is retained.  Research conducted by Igor Kokcharov, Ph.D, has analyzed the so-called retention rate of learning with  results shown in the following graph:

Characteristics of Machine Learning

Machine learning has become a rapidly growing  subset of artificial intelligence research. The application of so-called neural network software, mimicking  functions of the human brain coupled with the availability of low-cost massive computational hardware resources provides opportunities to solve problems which so far have relied on human brain-power.

Huge data pools (big data) consisting of  medical or financial information,  picture libraries or information about customer behavior to name just a few are processed with various types of highly complex algorithms to produce digital knowledge without conventional programming. Various applications such as image/object  recognition, speech recognition or language comprehension and automated report writing are based on  machine learning and the list is growing. These applications can also be combined with conventional systems as realized in self driving cars or the management of other robotic devices.

To generate knowledge different types of machine learning concepts are used:

  • In supervised learning the algorithms make predictions based on a set of examples. For instance, historical stock prices can be used to provide guesses for future prices. Each example used for training is labeled with the value of interest—in this case the stock price. A supervised learning algorithm looks for patterns in those value labels. It can use any information that might be relevant—the day of the week, the season, the company’s financial data, the type of industry or the presence of disruptive geopolicitical events. After the algorithm has found the best pattern, it uses that pattern to make predictions like tomorrow’s stock
  • In unsupervised learning data points have no labels associated with them. Instead, the goal of an unsupervised learning algorithm is to organize the data in some way or to describe its structure. This can mean grouping it into clusters or finding different ways of looking at complex data so that it appears simpler or more organized. From that data we might be able to extract knowledge which we were previously unaware of.
  • In reinforced learning the algorithm gets to choose an action in response to each data point. The learning algorithm also receives a reward signal a short time later, indicating how good the decision was. Based on this, the algorithm modifies its strategy in order to achieve the highest reward. Reinforcement learning is common in robotics, where the set of sensor readings at one point in time is a data point, and the algorithm must choose the robot’s next action.

Machine learning is complex and difficult to comprehend partially due to the strong expertise required in mathematics and probability theory. Consequently progress in machine learning is driven by a few teams with the best ‘brains’ worldwide working in research institutions or being employed by the large tech giants like Google, Microsoft, Amazone, Apple etc. One key driver of advancements in machine learning is brain research and new computational models of brain functions which can be used to define new algorithms.

The potential of combining human and machine learning

From the points raised so far one can conclude that the results of  level 1 (memorizing knowledge) and 2 (understanding and comprehending) of human learning as defined by ‘Bloom’s Taxanomy’  can also be achieved by means of supervised machine learning.

It is proven that machine based knowledge at level 1 and 2  far exceeds the capacity of the human brain. Consequently humans tend to increasingly rely on machine based knowledge with the added advantage that there is no retention problem as this knowledge is always accessible ‘on-line’.

Going further up the learning ladder to level 3 (applying and abstracting) and 4 (problem analyzing) the combination of human and machine learning knowledge represents ‘ state-of-the-art’ in various business segments. For example in health care where analyzing symptoms of illnesses  with a machine learning system crunching through massive medical records determines the probability which illness might cause the problem. The decision how to proceed is still left up to the person responsible for the cure. In an initiative based on its WATSON cognitive machine learning platform IBM in cooperation with a number of health clinics and hospitals has made significant progress to offer such diagnostic services to doctors including a list of the drugs or treatments currently available to cure the problem.

Level 5 (judging, evaluating) and level 6 (creating, problem solving) rely mostly on human brain knowledge as their learning space requires cross links  to social and other value systems which are not yet mapped with machine learning knowledge. Intuition, consciousness and awareness play an important role in leadership decision making, however simple decisions will be more and more outsourced to machine learning knowledge at level 1 to 4 of the learning hierarchy.

What educational research clearly suggest is that to be effective in learning and applying level  5 and 6 knowledge, humans have to comprehend the entire knowledge hierarchy. The process of memorizing as learned at level 1 is a prerequisite  for all other learning activities. Consequently humans have to keep their memorizing brain activity in good health in order to be fit for level 5 and 6 knowledge comprehension.  Interactive brain-training as provided by a number of companies is possibly one way to improve our learning capacity. Sport activities, sleep, healthy diets,reading or meditation provide other means to support brain health.


Learning has been valued by humans for hundreds of years. The invention of printing in the 15th century by Johannes Gutenberg initiated the democratizing of knowledge and information with an ever increasing momentum.

With the internet the distribution of knowledge and information has reached a new dimension. The development of  interactive computer based courses (MOOC’s) for formal education has created a marketplace accessible by anyone where only the best courses will prevail. As these courses are typically produced by universities and their teaching staff, the quality of the courses are closely linked to the reputation of the university.

With machine learning  a new tool has emerged which is likely to raise our capacity to learn if applied in an ethically responsible way. Educators and policy makers must get involved in the discussion as how to best apply machine learning in combination with human learning. The consequences are far- reaching as continuous brain research will advance machine learning over the years to come.


  • I liked very much and posted in my linkedin your article because it summarises human learning process through Bloom´s taxonomy, and gives examples of the process´levels between machine and us humans.

  • For me the main problem with “machine learning” is that most people working with these technologies don’t understand human learning very well.
    Most models for human learning are machine-based models with just a little human “umph” added.
    The problem begins when the body (which is visible) is confused with the person and his mind (which are not visible, thus we can be tricked to thinking of them as less real).
    Human experience far exceeds experience in this body. Thus, the human mind is full of data, experience, and training patterns which, though perhaps forgotten, are nevertheless retrievable and usable. What passes for learning in most current theories actually involves a combination of prior experience with the more present-time task of adapting those resources to the present body and environment. The brain per se is not much involved, though we can guess that it is built along similar patterns to how the mind is built. The brain is mostly concerned with handling the current body. It’s operation and mechanisms are pretty automatic. Many mental mechanisms are largely automatic as well, but they don’t have to be.
    In the interest of brevity, I have not tried to explain where I got this material.

    • Larry, I like your reply. I have a poorly worded questions to see if I am getting you. When you say ” training patterns which, though perhaps forgotten, are nevertheless retrievable and usable” Are you saying we can’t logically trace back to how we come to each momentary understanding of the world because 1) There is data and relationships at play beyond our memory 2) The relationships are based too heavily on anecdotal experiences that to organize in a logical way. Sorry I am hoping that doesn’t just sound like gibberish.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *